In recent years researchers have pointed out that much of psychology research involves participants who are WEIRD: Western, Educated, and from Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic countries. Why is that a problem? Because it could be that the insights we’re learning about how to live happy, meaningful lives privilege one group’s experiences—and they may not be as useful to people from other cultures and socioeconomic backgrounds.

A new study surveyed people in five regions around the world to see if the factors that influenced their happiness might be different. The discrepancies that the researchers found lend support to concerns that our current knowledge about well-being isn’t as universal as we might think.

“The implicit claim in previous research that ‘one size fits all’ is probably incorrect,” write Bruce Headey and his colleagues at the DIW Berlin research institute.


The study was based on the World Values Survey, which surveyed hundreds of thousands of people around the world from 1999 to 2014. The researchers decided to focus on five regions:

  • Western countries: United States, Britain, Australia, Spain, and others;
  • Latin America
  • Asian-Confucian countries:Hong Kong, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan;
  • Ex-communist countries:Russia and Eastern Europe; and
  • Communist countries:China and Vietnam.

People in each region reported on their values and priorities in life—the things that matter most to them. These included:

  • Traditional family values:The importance of family, as well as helping people who live nearby and caring for their needs.
  • Friendship and leisure values: The importance of friendship and leisure.
  • Materialistic values:Believing it’s important to be rich, successful, and recognized for your achievements.
  • Political values: The importance of politics.
  • Prosocial values:Believing it’s important to do something for the good of society and look after the environment.
  • Religious values: The importance of religion and God.

The researchers then compared how people rated the importance of these values to how satisfied they felt about their lives.
The results suggest that some values may be more universally important to well-being than others.

In all five regions, people who highly valued family, friendship/leisure, and pro-sociality tended to be more satisfied with life.

But the results for materialism, politics, and religion were more complicated.

People with stronger political values were more satisfied with life in communist countries, where “good citizens are supposed to be politically active” within the limits laid out by the state, explains Headey. This was also true to a lesser extent in the West.

Meanwhile, in ex-communist Russia and Eastern Europe, people who cared more deeply about politics were less happy. This may be due to the “disillusionment with politics” in those countries, after the fall of communism.

People who placed more importance on religion tended to be happier in the West, Latin America, and the Asian-Confucian countries. But they were less satisfied with life if they were living in the communist and ex-communist regions.

As the researchers speculate, this may be because communist governments tend to be hostile to religion, and people in ex-communist countries may still be suffering the long-term effects of that.

Materialism, a value that’s long been assumed to make us unhappy, actually went hand-in-hand with life satisfaction in Eastern Europe. It was only in the wealthier Western and Asian-Confucian countries where materialists tended to be less satisfied.

In Latin America and the Communist countries, being materialistic didn’t seem to matter to life satisfaction.


Why might some values be beneficial everywhere, whereas others only seem helpful in certain cultures?

The researchers suggest that people may be happier when their personal values align with the societal and governmental norms in their country.

In other words, some values may benefit us not in and of themselves, but because they give us a sense of belonging and make it easier for us to navigate the world.

These findings also help make sense of a paradox in happiness research—the fact that some regions (like Latin America) are much happier than their gross domestic product (GDP) would predict, while others (like Eastern Europe) are much less happy.

Examining the values people hold could help explain these discrepancies. In Eastern Europe, for example, the researchers found that many people rated all the different values as relatively unimportant, a recipe for unhappiness.

In Latin America, people’s strong family and religious ties seemed to bring them a great deal of satisfaction.

Though they aimed to be more inclusive, the researchers didn’t have access to surveys from sub-Saharan Africa or Muslim countries in the Middle East and Asia—which means this picture of wellbeing is still incomplete. But it does point to a provocative idea: that the path to happiness isn’t the same everywhere, and what works for you may depend on the society and culture in which you live.